I saw the movie Noah this past weekend. I really, genuinely liked it a lot. It’s possible I should move that into ‘love’ territory. The acting was BEAUTIFUL, and I thought a lot of really great questions came up. I do know a handful of people who went into see it with the expectation that it would follow the Biblical narrative exactly; I’m still unsure why they thought this, as the director, Darren Aronofsky specifically stated it was not the Biblical narrative. However, I didn’t find too many details that specifically went against what is stated in the Bible. I thought Aronofsky did a wonderful job of exploring the possibilities between the lines of the story as it’s written in the Bible.
Aronofsky had a REALLY intriguing take on the Nephilim (they were called The Watchers in the movie). I thought Emma Watson shone in this movie – there’s a scene near the end where her acting is almost painful it’s so well done (I’m a bit of an Emma Watson fan, though, so I may be slightly biased there); I thought she totally held her own against the much bigger name actors, Russell Crowe and Jennifer Connelly. The depiction of evil in the wicked city was spot on. The movie equated eating meat with evil men, which could be in line with the Bible – most scholars believe people didn’t start eating meat with God’s permission until after the Flood (so ostensibly, before the Flood, eating meat would have been a sin). I am unsure if I was reading into the scene where Noah encounters the wicked city, or not, but it seemed like men were even selling women for food, which takes the evil to an entirely different level.
I enjoyed the scenes on the ark the most. I thought the animals were handled with care. In my mind the animals were always kept in cages on the ark; however, Aronofsky’s proposed solution seems like wisdom. And it’s obvious he put some thought into what it would have been like.
The movie portrays the wicked men as fighting against Noah to get on the ark. I had never really thought about what it must have been like for every single other person on the earth. There was a particularly powerful scene after the flood waters rise and before everyone drowns, with the people outside the ark screaming in fear, as they cling to the mountains to keep from being washed away in the flood. I can’t imagine what that must have been like for Noah. How much he must have questioned himself and what he heard from God. I thought the movie explored the question of how you hear from God and how you deal with what you hear from God in such a beautiful way. Hearing from Him can be difficult; Noah’s resoluteness is to be admired, even though in the movie, he takes it overboard. But again, I know people in real life who have a calling from the Lord that they have taken too far.
There were points in the movie when I wanted to shake Noah and be like, “God isn’t like that!!!!” But then I remembered that he didn’t have the benefit of knowing Jesus. He knew God, but not in the way we do today. In his day, Jesus hadn’t yet drawn near, hadn’t yet clothed himself in humanity to make God the Father known in the flesh. His experience with God was vastly different than my own (not to mention the differences in the worlds we live in). The massive amount of guilt Noah must have carried around was exquisitely portrayed by Russell Crowe, in both the craziness on the ark, and the drinking scene near the end (where two of his sons cover up his nakedness, while the other looks on). Aronofsky’s take on that particular scene really drew together Noah’s emotions.
There’s criticism that this movie has a fundamentally environmentally friendly message to it. First of all, I would say, what’s wrong with being environmentally friendly? Secondly, while I did notice this message, there were only a couple of points where I felt like this was being pushed in my face. And those moments didn’t take away from the overall positive experience I had with the movie.
For me, one of the down sides was a weird strain of magic that seemed to be passed down in Noah’s line. There were about three scenes where it occurred, and I didn’t really see the point of it.
There were twp places I saw where Aronofsky took artistic license and directly contradicted the Bible: 1) the ages of the people in the movie/ the timeline under which the ark was built. The Bible says Noah was 500, and the ark took 100 years to build. The movie made Noah 60ish (maybe?), and the ark took 10 or so years to build (with the help of the Nephilim). 2) The marriage status of Noah’s sons. In the Bible, all of his sons had wives. In the movie, this isn’t true and becomes a source of tension.
Overall, I thought Aronofsky did a spectacular job with the story and I really enjoyed the movie. I think he was smart with the choices he made and he made me think about many different things – the job of all good storytellers. Do I think he got the whole thing right? No. Do I think the changes he made the story offend God, or do Him a disservice? No. Do I think he made a terrific movie? Yes. Do I care more about the story of Noah now? Do I have more thoughts on it? Absolutely. And really, what more can you ask for?
If you are interested in more information about where Aronofsky got some of his idea, the following article is one of the best I’ve seen: Noah, A Midrash
What You’re Saying: